Pit Bulls » Blog Mains » News » Pit Bull News Highlights – Week of August 1st, 2010

Pit Bull News Highlights – Week of August 1st, 2010

ADA Trumps BSL

Great news in the legal department for pit bulls owners this week. The Department of Justice ruled that the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) does NOT allow Breed Specific Legislation (BSL) to be applied to service dogs. The new ruling applies to all breeds, including pit bulls, which is good news for pit bull owners from Colorado to Florida, who have been told they can’t have their service dogs in specific cities and towns. A number of lawsuits are pending over this issue; presumably, the local municipalities will now drop the restrictions.

Subpart A, Section 35.104, of the ruling specifically addresses BSL:

“The Department does not believe that it is either appropriate or consistent with the ADA to defer to local laws that prohibit certain breeds of dogs based on local concerns that these breeds may have a history of unprovoked aggression or attacks.”

While this ruling addresses BSL only as it applies to service dogs, it’s a win for fairness and a blow against ignorance.

Three cheers for the DOJ!

Media Bias against Pit Bulls

Meanwhile, good news on the media front as well. Inspired by reader Monika Courtney, who responded to a headline story about a pit bull attack with an impassioned letter complaining that pit bulls are treated unfairly by the Denver Post and the rest of the news media, Post reporter John Davidson decided to check out her allegations.

Readers of this blog will no doubt be entirely unsurprised by Davidson’s findings. He cited, among other sources, a National Canine Resource Council study of media coverage of dog bites over a four day period which included the following:

August 18, 2007 — A Labrador mix attacked a 70-year-old man, sending him to the hospital in critical condition. Police officers arrived at the scene and the dog was shot after charging the officers. This incident was reported in one article in the local paper.

August 19, 2007 — A 16-month-old child received fatal head and neck injuries after being attacked by a mixed-breed dog. This attack was reported twice by the local paper.

August 20, 2007 — A six-year-old boy was hospitalized after having his ear torn off and receiving a severe bite to the head by a medium-sized, mixed-breed dog. This incident was reported in one article in the local paper.

August 21, 2007 — A 59-year-old woman was attacked in her home by two pit bulls and was hospitalized with severe, but not fatal, injuries. This attack was reported in over 230 articles in national and international newspapers, as well as major television news networks including CNN, MSNBC and Fox.

If you ever wonder why you see so many pit bull attack stories in the media (aside from the uncertainty over how many of these attacks are actually by pit bulls), to quote Davidson’s article, “anti-pit bull bias in the media is more than just a theory — it’s a fact.”

Save Peter the Pit Bull from the Pearly Gates!

And speaking of anti pit bull bias, readers are urged to contact the Sturbridge, Massachusets Town Council at (508) 347-2511 before an August 5th hearing to appeal the death sentence handed out to Peter, a Sturbridge pit bull. Peter committed the horrific crime of running up to a neighbor. The dangerous canine compounded his perfidy after the poor woman began beating him over the head with a caulking gun. In a truly gruesome display of viciousness, Peter grabbed the caulking gun away from her, ran back to his yard, and began playing with it.

Of course, Peter has a long history of crimes. When he was 9 weeks old, he was attacked by this same neighbor’s adult husky. Later, as an adult pit bull, Peter got loose from his owner and barked at a poodle. While he was barking at the poodle, the woman next door (yes, the same one) again ran out and yelled at him, then retreated behind her glass door when Peter charged toward her. Supposedly, Peter attacked the glass door. The poodle, not behind a glass door, remained unharmed. In yet another case of canine criminality, Peter was briefly unlicensed at one point.

It is understandable that these incidents outweigh the affidavits of numerous other neighbors, including the cleaning lady who sees Peter on a regular basis, and the testimony of an animal control officer who put Peter through a battery of tests designed to provoke aggression and concluded “I would not consider Peter to be aggressive or a threat to society more than any other dog residing in the town of Sturbridge.”

If you wish to see Peter granted mercy despite his horrific crimes, the number to call to plead his case is, again, (508) 347-2511. You can also contact the Board of Selectmen, who sentenced Peter to death, at (508) 347-2500 or by fax at (508) 347-5886. The Town Hall is open Monday through Friday, 8:00 AM to 4:00 PM.

This probably goes without saying, but just in case: Please be respectful with your calls and faxes. People are much more likely to respond well to polite treatment, and there’s a good chance that whoever answers the phone will not be one of the people who imposed the death sentence. Also, keep in mind your comments will reflect on the breed (and Peter!) as well as yourself.

Author: Matthias

Hey all! I’m Matthias and I love Pit Bulls (as you probably can guess lol). Until a couple years ago I had Blaze next to me while writing the articles for this blog and he was my inspiration, he still is but - hopefully - from a better life 🙂

I am not a veterinarian or veterinary health care specialist, so nothing in this blog should be taken or used as a substitute for professional help. Use our content as information to have a basic understanding about Pit Bulls but always look for expert advice, specifically when treating or diagnosing your Pittie.

Hope my articles are of any help to you, your family and especially your Pit Bull. Thanks for stopping by, enjoy!

Follow me on:     

6 thoughts on “Pit Bull News Highlights – Week of August 1st, 2010”

  1. I would give up my
    I would give up my citizenship for our J. I would also take up arms against anyone threatning my wife,children or k-9’s ( My family is not negotiable)

  2. I can also attest to media
    I can also attest to media bias. When I was 4 I was attaked by a lab and had my ear ripped off and had to get over 50 stitches on my head and face. Not a single report anywhere…

  3. I can not believe that they
    I can not believe that they would continue with the euthenasia after the dog passed the tests. Ruca took the good citizen test and passed everythig but could not be certified because she refused to stay and let me walk away. Who ever imposed the death sentence should not be able to sleep at night knowing he had a good dog put down!

  4. What an unfortunate
    What an unfortunate circumstance for Peter. I pray that the best comes to him. 🙂 I couldn’t imagine life without my pit bull, O’Shea. He has been the best addition to our house; the best pet we could have dreamed of or asked for. He wouldn’t harm a fly (wait, wait…he likes to chase the flies sometimes, and will eat them if they are still enough, lol).

  5. Dogs, as a species, do not
    Dogs, as a species, do not perform behaviors “just because”. There are reasons for behavior, and when aggression becomes a problem…the REASONS are usually like improper handling, lack of training or socialization, a misreading of dog behavior by the owner, or, rarely, disease. SO…if any statement is claiming “unprovoked attacks/aggression”…it’s always made by someone who has no credibility.

    This is crazy how pit bulls have bad reputations…yet everyBODY uses them for everyTHING. This lady on E-TV cooking show uses a “cute puppy” as her logo, and it’s a put bull. Almost every bag of dog food has a photo of a dog on it somewhere, obviously…and 90% of the time it’s a beautiful cute pit bull. MTV’s logo is a pit bull…The Dog Whisperer’s dog named “DADDY” is a pit bull…anyways…what are the nation’s major companies going to do when they’re forced to change their LOGOS because someone comes along later and tells them that their “cute” or “beautiful” dog used to advertise their product IS A PIT BULL? How stupid would it be for them to change? It would be ludicrous…and they WON’T and SHOULDN’T change.

  6. Hey guys, wanted to update
    Hey guys, wanted to update you.

    I gave the Board of Selectman’s office a call, and the dude I spoke to said that the Selectman left it open for the owners to appeal! He’s going to have another day in court to get this settled. The news article you linked to did not supply this information.

    Apparently other neighbors were involved in wanting the dog to be put down. You’d think the animal control officer’s tests would mean something, though. Those types of tests most likely include sensitivity (harsh petting), taking food from the dog while he’s eating it, and introduction to new strange dogs. These were the types of things tested for at the animal shelter I used to work for, and many other dogs who seem perfectly nice have failed them. For Peter to pass them is a big deal.

    I feel it would not hurt to continue to give public support by calling in and asking for the dog to not be euthanized, just know that there will likely be an appeal happening.